Net Culture Talk

Trends and topics on the web, from social media to the latest YouTube sensations

You are here

Google’s New Formula SUCKS

Replies

Anonymous's picture
Submitted by Anonymous on

The problem is perhaps with you?

Put "Taco Bell" in quotation marks.

The first four hits are for tacobell.com

And seriously, if you need to search to find an obvious .com address?

Google's algorithim isn't the problem.

sarajean's picture
Submitted by sarajean on

Actually, it is, and the point is that content is subjective. An algorithm won't deliver. And the point of the alorithm change itself, of course, was to find relevant content without the need for specifics or tools, which most users don't seem to employ.

I can't disclose the topics I searched for during my research--hence, I provided the most generic examples I could--but most were medical and none came up the way they normally do. On the other hand, Bing's searches were right on. It's on my toolbar now.

Ed's picture
Submitted by Ed on

I thought it was just me for a day.  I was thinking how come i can't find exactly what i am looking for right away as i normally would. I do extensive research and searching hours every day and also SEO and coding are some of the services i offer to clients.  So far none of those client SEO rankings have been affected much because i have always done SEO copywriting in an informational format.  But when it comes to finding actual coding examples or coding information my god what the hell has happened.  I'm now skipping page one and going right to page 2 or 3 to start looking for something that is worth a damn that has any real value.  What this has caused me to do is organize my massive collection of bookmarks so that i can go directly to sites that i know have real value. One of the things that made Google so great before was that I could find the exact thing that i was looking for almost instantly, now i am wading through a lot of crap. Hey maybe this will create a whole new market - selling bookmarks that point to sites with real value.  LOL

sarajean's picture
Submitted by sarajean on

I know, right? It's been a pain in the neck. I've found that Bing is easier to use so far, but most of my stuff--bookmarks, tools, even email--are all in Google. You're right, selling bookmarks to quality sites could get pretty lucrative!

Ghost AM's picture
Submitted by Ghost AM on

I am an aspiring musician and since the change I cannot find myself. Before the change I could find myself on page ONE. Now I am a ghost. Google used to be perfect but they just shot themselves in the face. I can't find anything and like you, I USED to be able to find ANYTHING. It's google.

Rachel's picture
Submitted by Rachel on

Much like you, I used to pride myself on my Internet research capabilites, and I had the efficiency of Google to thank for it. My husband could never find anything, and I would always say, "That's because you're using Yahoo. Go to Google and run the same search..." Obviously, that was then. I've been frustrated with my Google searches for a while, but only today did I hit the point where I wondered just what was going on. Great. New algorithm.

So... you think Bing is better? I'm seriously at the point where I'm ready to check it out.

Atrian's picture
Submitted by Atrian on

Wow.  So happy I read all this.  I hope google listens and responds.  Their search results are really in the toliet.  I feel as if I'm wading through pointless pages of poo. 

Brian's picture
Submitted by Brian on

I was on my blackberry today looking for an address for a business and knew I had been able to just put in the name, city, and state and there it was, now I have to dig to find it. It's like they went backwards, bing starts to get my lookups.

Tucson Blonde's picture
Submitted by Tucson Blonde on

I, too, was the "Queen" of internet searches using Google... it's WHY I SWITCHED to Google to begin with, in the late 1990s... My colleagues were all astonished with the amount of RELEVANT pages or credible websites I would find, because I had a skill for typing the most relevant words in the search box... When I returned to college to go into scientific research it was the first time I joined an “industry” that basically exclusively searched using Google.

Google changed their algorithm not to "tailor" your search to your needs (like they “reluctantly” reported, in the months following this change earlier this year), but rather to SELL!

Ever since they IPO'd in 2004 they obviously needed to increase annual revenues to make their investors happy, so they have been tinkering around with their "look", the "products" they have either created or purchased... it's all a big scam!

Most people on the internet don't even know what they really want and can be easily "distracted" by the first 10 hits and will most likely choose one of them because they have NO CLUE, that what they are “really” looking for is a few pages into their search results.

Only people who know what they are looking for have EVEN NOTICED, because Google made little effort to inform people that their algorithm had even changed... thinking obviously that no one would notice!

So I am NOT happy, but BING is not much different (otherwise Bing would have come out strong as an alternative to Google when it first launched back in 2009)! MS Bing even advertised that they were actually a "tailor" made research tool, which is why I chose not to switch even though I did make a few attempts to find relevant and reputable pages in searches on Bing. But all they fed me was crap, too...  Meanwhile, as a social-science researcher, I can't wait until some “unknown” company launches a search-tool like the one that Google had created 10 years ago... I will be one of the very first people to switch! In the meantime, I have to spend nearly 2x as much time digging around multiple search engines and pages deep into my searches just to even get close to what it is that’s actually relevant… AND I find I use the library much more often now… Thank God for BOOKS!

Leave a Reply

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <ul> <ol> <li> <i> <b> <img> <table> <tr> <td> <th> <div> <strong> <p> <br> <u>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.